The “Microbead-Free Waters Act”: Saying Goodbye to the Tiny Plastic Fragments That Pollute Our Waterways

By Roberta Attanasio, IEAM Blog Editor


Microplastics, including microbeads. Credit: MPCA Photos, CC BY-NC 2.0.

Microbeads—tiny, plastic beads added to face scrubs, soap, toothpaste, and the like—cause environmental damage at the macro scale. Their function is to provide a bit of grit, but they end up in lakes, rivers, and other aquatic habitats. Once there, microbeads are mistaken for food and gobbled up by zooplankton, thus becoming incorporated into the aquatic food chain. Small fish, and other organisms that swallow the contaminated zooplankton, are eaten by bigger fish and eventually, microbeads make their way to the top of the food chain, reaching other wildlife and even humans. However, there is more to this story.

In aquatic environments, microbeads soak up environmental pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Zooplankton that ingest microbeads can accumulate PCBs and PAHs (through adsorption), which biomagnify (become more concentrated) up the food chain. These pollutants are endocrine disruptors and can damage immune, reproductive, nervous, and endocrine systems in both wildlife and humans.

There is good news, though. Thanks to the Microbead-Free Waters Act approved a week ago by the House of Representatives, the dispersal of microbeads in the environment will likely become, within the next two years, a thing of the past. The bill, which will now go to the Senate for approval, would phase out microbeads from products in the US starting July 1, 2017.

Congressman Frank Pallone, who introduced the bill earlier this year with Committee Chairman Fred Upton, said: “Most people who buy personal care products that contain microbeads are unaware that these tiny bits of plastic seep into waterways, threatening the environment and ultimately our health. Our bill is a bipartisan and common-sense solution. It is our responsibility to implement a nationwide ban on plastic microbeads, and spur a transition to non-synthetic alternatives.”

Microbeads in cosmetics

Microbeads in personal care products. Credit: Schooner Adventuress, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

But how do microbeads end up in waterways? When exfoliating compounds in cosmetics and hygiene products are rinsed off, they go down the drain—and whatever goes down the drain, ends up in waterways. Because of the widespread use of products containing microbeads1, large amounts of these plastic fragments are routinely discarded into wastewater. According to a 2014 report cited by The New York Times, nearly 19 tons of microbeads go down the drain in New York State every year.

Microbeads on fingertip

Microbeads. Credit: MPCA Photos, CC BY-NC 2.0.

Additionally, most wastewater treatment plants are not equipped to filter particles as fine as microbeads, which range between 0.5 micrometers and 1 millimeter in size. Rebecca Sutton of the San Francisco Estuary Institute told PBS, “Municipal wastewater systems were designed for our [bodily] waste and food waste, but they’re not engineered to handle tiny bits of plastics. Upgrading waste treatment facilities to handle microbead waste would cost billions, and it wouldn’t necessarily be effective.”

In September 2015, a team of scientists estimated that 8 trillion microbeads per day are being released into aquatic habitats in the United States, and that another 800 trillion end up in sludge from sewage plants, which is often spread over areas of land. Many of those microbeads can then make their way into streams and oceans through runoff. The scientists conclude that: “The probability of risk from microbead pollution is high while the solution to this problem is simple. Banning microbeads from products that enter wastewater will ultimately protect water quality, wildlife, and resources used by people.”

The Microbead-Free Waters Act is now providing the solution. The federal legislation will follow action taken by several states. Last month, California finalized a bill that phases out microbeads from 2020. However, it was Illinois to first ban the production, manufacture, or sale of personal care products containing microbeads, especially because of concerns raised in 2013 about the heavy microbead pollution in the Great Lakes, the largest freshwater ecosystem on earth. A recent study shows that in certain areas of the Great Lakes, densities of floating plastics are as high as those reported for areas of litter accumulation within oceanic gyres.

After the House passed the Microbead-Free Waters Act, Congressman Upton said: “These microbeads are tiny plastic, but big time pollution. As someone who grew up on Lake Michigan and represents a large chunk of Michigan coastline, I understand firsthand how important it is to maintain the beauty and integrity of our Great Lakes. They may be smaller than a pinhead, but once they’ve been flushed down the drain is where the problem starts.”

exfoliator_poppy seeds

Exfoliant containing poppy seeds. Credit: Heidi Uusitorppa, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

In response to the impending ban and growing concern from the general public, several companies, including large multinationals, have begun replacing microbeads with natural, biodegradable alternatives such as rice, apricot seeds, walnut shells, powdered pecan shells, and bamboo. Will these alternatives be not only natural and biodegradable, but also sustainably sourced? As more and more consumers increase their environmental awareness and push for change, hygiene and beauty giants may finally respond to public pressure and follow the footsteps of the food industry by acknowledging the damage done in the past, while keeping a keen eye on life cycle assessment programs.


1. Do your personal care products contain microbeads? Find lists of products by country here

6 thoughts on “The “Microbead-Free Waters Act”: Saying Goodbye to the Tiny Plastic Fragments That Pollute Our Waterways

    1. Ray Kinney

      Yes, great. but, why should it reach a situation where the senate has to act on such obvious regulatory lapses? It seems to just demonstrate that the whole system of regulatory and industry ethics degradation of ‘due diligence’ is not adequately functional currently. The senate should not have to deal piecemeal with such matters, common industry practice should somehow require better due diligence, even before the regulatory system needs to get involved, and the senate action should be only a last resort fix. Industry needs to become more accountable for ethics. IMHO

  1. Ray Kinney

    Ultimately, what should the responsibility of industry be in being aware of the state of the current science before developing products that have high likelihood of such ecotoxicologic pollution?
    Industry should be required to have better forethought from the ‘get go’. The current paradigm of ‘gaming the system’, to quickly get products out on the market before regulations can catch up with the risks to public and environmental health, to gain ‘profit margin’, needs to become much more socially responsible somehow. If corporations now are legally said to have ‘personhood standing’, should they not be held accountable for having done due diligence in providing for as much public health safety, just as a person is legally responsible for his or her actions that harm society? The current science is highly suggestive of likely harm from inclusion of micro bead pollution effects. There should be corporate responsibility of a higher level required before excessive ‘profit-taking’ allows externalized costs to harm society so blatantly. IMHO

    1. Roberta Attanasio

      Until we move from proof-of-harm policies to proof-of-safety policies, we will run into similar problems over and over again. It’s a long road ahead, but it can be done.

  2. Jenny Onass

    Does anyone know what the law or regulation of plastic microbeads is in the UK please? I am a teacher in the UK. I worked in aquatic ecotoxicology a decade ago.
    I am setting up an environmental study student group at school to focus on topics that are not covered in specifications and this is a key topic I would like to cover.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.