Microplastic Pollution, Lugworm Health, and Marine Ecosystems

By Roberta Attanasio, IEAM Blog Editor

Lugworm casts

Lugworm (Arenicola marina) casts, by Nick Veitch, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0

Lugworms (Arenicola marina) live in muddy sand – they’re a component of the food chain and fishermen look for them because they make great bait. Their presence is given away by the piles of sand (casts) deposited above the burrows in which they live. Each burrow has two openings at the surface. The worm draws sand into the burrow through one of the openings and, following digestion, expels the sand through the other opening, thus carrying out its ecosystem engineering duty – sediment turnover – across beaches on both sides of the North Atlantic.

Now, lugworms are threatened by microplastics, one of the world’s major pollutants. Microplastics are very small particles – microparticles and nanoparticles – which include pre-production plastic pellets and polyethylene beads from personal care products, or derive from the breakdown of larger plastic pieces through mechanical and biological processes.

Microplastics

Chris Jordan’s (US) work “Gyre” depicts 2.4 million pieces of plastic, equal to the estimated number of pounds of plastic. Courtesy Ars Electronica, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Because microplastics can not only enter the food web with ease but can also adsorb toxic chemicals in amounts a hundred times greater than those present in sediments, a team of scientists recently performed a study to test the ability of microplastics to transfer toxic chemicals (hydrocarbons, antimicrobials, flame retardants) to lugworm tissues. Tissue bioaccumulation can affect the health status of lugworms and, consequently, their important eco-physiological functions.

The scientists exposed the lugworms to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) previously prepared by separate adsorption of nonylphenol, phenanthrene, triclosan and PBDE-47. The results of the study (Microplastic Moves Pollutants and Additives to Worms, Reducing Functions Linked to Health and Biodiversity), published in Current Biology (December 2, 2013), show that – once ingested – the four chemicals desorbed from PVC and transferred into tissues, some at concentrations that compromised functions pivotal for sustaining health and biodiversity. Specifically, triclosan reduced survival, triclosan and PBDE reduced feeding, nonylphenol reduced immunity and therefore the ability to remove pathogenic bacteria, and PVC by itself reduced the antioxidant capacity.

Mark Anthony Browne, lead author of the study, said: “The work is important because current policy in the United States and abroad considers microplastic as non-hazardous, yet our work shows that large accumulations of microplastic have the potential to impact the structure and functioning of marine ecosystems.”

Chelsea Rochman and colleagues state “If current plastic consumption rates continue, the planet will hold another 33 billion tonnes of plastics by 2050. This would fill 2.75 bil¬lion refuse-collection trucks, which would wrap around the planet roughly 800 times if placed end to end.”

One of the possible solutions is to classify the most problematic plastics as hazardous. Rochman and colleagues estimate that by adopting this classification and replacing hazardous plastic with safer and reusable materials in the next decade, worldwide plastic waste could be reduced to just 4 billion tonnes.

2 thoughts on “Microplastic Pollution, Lugworm Health, and Marine Ecosystems

  1. jon lovelett

    Lugworms are harmless creatures, and now they’re even threatened by microplastics. Consider they don’t have an easy life in general. They’re often the preferred bait for fishing cod. How do sport fishermen get them so they can fish? They dig up beaches. Imagine how easily this continuous digging can lead to environmental and sustainability problems, if you think that the dreaded digging practice is widespread in many regions. Fishermen know very well that it takes a month, and even longer, for a beach area that has been dug-out to be repopulated of lugworms up to density levels near to the normal ones. Please, please, if you want to get your lugworms, do so, but do so in a sustainable way. I don’t know which one is worst, microplastics or irresponsible digging, and I’m not sure I want to find out.

    Reply
  2. Ray Kinney

    As plastic objects degrade in the environment, what is the environmental fate of all of the chemical plasticizers? Many metals, including lead and cadmium can be released to pollute the waters further. It is not just the ingestion of small microparticles that can cause harm to organisms.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s